Talk:Tara Brabazon
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Related to peerage? edit
How, if at all, is Professor Brabazon related to the Earls of Meath and the Barons Brabazon of Tara? Surely Tara Brabazon must be related somehow to Brabazon of Tara.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 11:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Notability...? edit
Is this biography's subject notable enough to have her own article? Wikipedia serves as a database to include people who are (as stated in Wikipedia:Notability) "worthy of notice" or "note" – that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life. Objectively, I cannot see how this person falls under any of these categories. Being a professor of Cultural Studies, a school that does not, in fact, exist within Flinder University [1], and an author of insignificant publications, does not warrant having an entire article devoted to oneself.
Regards, Anon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.123.160.226 (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree. This person is not noteworthy enough to warrant a wikipedia entry/ 137.166.126.40 (talk) 01:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)