Talk:Tansen, Nepal

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merger proposal

Mission Hospital edit

Seems like a little too much detail about the hospital for this article, but WikiPedia could certainly use an article dedicated to mission hospitals in Nepal that the Tansen article could link to. Plus other Christian missionary work in the country.

Now that Nepal is a republic and no longer a Hindu kingdom where proselytizing was made illegal, perhaps the full story can be told! LADave (talk) 20:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

I propose that Tansen, Nepal be merged with Tansing. The other article has some important historical context but is an orphan and titled with a non-standard transcrption from nepali. The page Tansing could then be deleted. 173.46.104.35 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Support Clearly the same place, support merging of both articles. Richard3120 (talk) 03:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support the idea of a merge, but there is no referenced material at all on the page, despite being tagged for several years. Therefore, redirected. Klbrain (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tansen, Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply