Talk:Tanner Glass/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by AGK in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AGK [] 22:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Concisely written article. No prose or language errors came across during review.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Covers all aspects of the subject matter in adequate depth.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Satisfies WP:NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article. Incident is not a current one and is not rapidly unfolding.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Sparse but adequate use of images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I like how well this article flows: it gives good, progressive coverage of his entire career, supplemented by the career statistics and personal life sections. I'm happy to grant this article GA status. AGK [] 22:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply