This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 10 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Article creator has same name as the subject. Also concerns about the notability of the subject; we don't usually create pages for people of this judicial rank. Solipsism 101 (talk) 19:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Since the comment above was made, Ikram has received considerable coverage in the press. I suggest that even if notability was an issue in 2022, it is not now. Greenshed (talk) 17:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
