Talk:Taking a Snow Town

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 13 July 2024 by reviewer Cerebellum (talk · contribs).

Russia B‑class

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts B‑class

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Intertranswiki/OKA Unassessed

	This article has been created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association. See the OKA task force page of WikiProject Intertranswiki.Intertranswiki/OKAWikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKATemplate:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKAOKA articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Kseni-kam (talk) 04:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Submission declined on 12 July 2024 by Cerebellum (talk).

Please fix the reference errors then resubmit.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Cerebellum 31 hours ago. Last edited by Cerebellum 3 minutes ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Hi! I've seen your comments on this and other articles about references fixing, I've just been out for a few days. I'll work on them. Thanks.Kseni-kam (talk) 15:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)"Reply

@Kseni-kam: No problem, I'll try to review the articles promptly once they're ready. Your articles are so much better than what we usually get at AfC, it's fun reviewing them :) --Cerebellum (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Could you help me please with the shortened footnotes? I feel a bit lost: seen the article you recommended on the topic, but just can't get what does it has to do with these references errors, what's wrong between the citation format and the reference in bibliography list itself, etc. And also sometimes they work and other times they don't (like, for example, in this very article ref.44 and 108 work, and a lot of others don't even though their format is the same). I'd really appreciate, if you could help me with a concrete example of fixing to go futher with it and not to click here and there in vain as I am doing now :'( Kseni-kam (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Kseni-kam: Of course, we have to make sure the text in the shortened footnote exactly matches the "last=" parameter in the bibliography.

So for example you have: {{Harvard citation text|Дурылин С. Н.|1930|p=26}}

And then in the bibliography: |last=Дурылин

To fix this one we can get rid of the initials: {{Harvard citation text|Дурылин|1930|p=26}}

And then it will work. Please note that these shortened footnotes are not at all required, if they are too annoying you just format the reference as plain text: Дурылин (1930, p. 26). Does that make more sense? --Cerebellum (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Such a little detail and everything changes...Thank you so much!! I think it's ready now to be reviewed. Let me know, please, if you see any other mistakes that I repeat with a format o anything else, so not to repeat it again in new translations. Kseni-kam (talk) 19:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fantastic!! Thank you for hard work on these translations :) --Cerebellum (talk) 20:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply