Talk:Taihō Code

TAIHO CODE ROCKS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.82.108.177 (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move to Taihō Code. —Nightstallion (?) 11:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

"Code of Taiho" or "Taiho Code"?

I've always known it as the "Taiho Code", not the "Code of Taiho". A Google search using "Taiho Code" (with quotes for exact phrase search) turns up 517 results, while "Code of Taiho" turns up only 67 results, some of them Wikipedia-related. Also, "Code of Taiho" sounds awkward. I would like to propose having "Code of Taiho" redirect to "Taiho Code", rather than vice-versa.

Requested move

Code of Taihō → Taihō Code – per: 1. Taihō Code used more often. 2. Code of Taihō sounds awkward.

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

• Support For reasons mentioned above.--Sir Edgar 04:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Support sounds ok, and article could also start by Taiho code or Taiho Ritsuryo Tensaibuta 05:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Support. As the one who started this article and, I think, contributed the most, I am surprised to discover that all my books refer to either "Taiho Code" or "Taiho ritsuryo" and not The Code of Taiho. I wonder where I got that from. LordAmeth 10:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Support. Results of Google Scholar and Google Books agree Taiho Code is more common. --Kusunose 10:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Here we go again - Korean influence on early Japan

Yes, we Wikipedians are encouraged to be bold. But as this issue of Korean influence on early Japan has been a hot topic on a number of different pages recently, some of them exploding into full-on edit wars, I am hoping that we can discuss this here, and hopefully reach some sort of compromise. As for my opinion, I acknowledge the importance of Korean cultural and political influences on the Yamato state. And I think that some mention of this is interesting to include in the article, provided it is accurate and relevant, even if it is not 100% necessary to an understanding of the topic. LordAmeth 02:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

However, Korea is not related to the approval of TaihoCode. Japan valued obtaining information from China directly. --Orchis29 (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Exact year when the code was enacted

What is the exact year when the code was enacted? This article says 703, but other articles (such as Taihō (era), Daijō-kan, Daijō-daijin, etc) say 702. --Miwako Sato (talk) 11:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)