Talk:Taiga (project management)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Need help here. I'm still mapping various open source project management applications. Deletionists, it's not easy to start pages. So please chill.

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Psy~enwiki (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2016 (UTC) I wasn't aware that a similar entry was deleted before. At any rate, there are far more notable and reliable sources now about this topic than when a similar entry was first considered. Those working in the field of project management would readily recognize Taiga as an alternative to proprietary systems. I have another wikipedia entry on another important project management system (Tuleap). Yet another new entry I did is on a risk management system, a sub-category of project management systems.Reply

May I also note that the old deleted entry was on the site (Taiga.io) and not on the project management system itself as a stand-alone system.

If one also looks at the history of this entry, there was already a nomination for speedy deletion but was later declined. If we'd visit the Pillars of Wikipedia, then we'd realize that we should all just be working on this entry to improve it rather than try to wipe this off the face of the earth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psy~enwiki (talk • contribs) 17:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Psy~enwiki (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please check the history of this entry. The question as to whether this is worth a page on Wikipedia has been debated already in the past. I have entries focused on project management. If you work in this area, you'll understand why there's should be entries on major individual platforms. I am an academic and don't pick or promote a particular platform. I only cover the major ones.

Thanks.

Peter

Add topic