Talk:Tagbilaran

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jafeluv in topic Requested move

Comments needed edit

Please comment on the present contents of the article Tagbilaran City. How else to improve it?--Pinay06 01:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

It needs a (1) Gallery update, (2) Current and future development plans section, and probably (3) Separation of institutions into another topic (or not). With regards to the gallery, I can do that. Will be going home by June this year for 2 weeks. Majuro (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC), Local Timezone 21:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC+12)Reply
Good to hear that! That will be sooo much appreciated. Pinay (talkemail) 17:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

<Cityname> <City> edit

There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities. This may imminently affect the article name for Tagbilaran. For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented. Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion. If you wish to participate, please post your comments here. --JinJian (talk) 04:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


Tagbilaran CityTagbilaran — Part of series of multiple page move requests involving Philippine cities under the category General rule -> eliminate the word “city” from the name of the Philippine cities except those needing disambiguation. This request is made after preliminary discussions for the removal of the word "city" from most of the article titles of Philippine cities and providing disambiguation wherever necessary. Some disambiguation may involve using the <cityname>, <provincename> format, regardless if it is highly urbanized, independent or component cities. In here, <provincename> purports to describe the general area and not necessary as the mother political unit of the city, since some people might have wrongly believed that this naming convention is exclusively for Philippine towns only. For more information please see Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines/Task_force_LGU#Article_names_for_Philippine_cities:_.3Ccityname.3E_.3Ccity.3E. JinJian (talk) 07:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Support for the numerous reasons I have stated over the years. See the linked discussion page in the proposal for details. --seav (talk) 00:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.