Talk:Tactical assault group

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Australia: Crime / Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Tactical assault group is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Incorrect references being added by Accuracychaser edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Accuracychaser. As I indicated on my talk page several days ago the references you are using to support your changes do not say what you claim they do, and citing "Defence Briefings 2014" does not qualify as a source (pls ser our policy WP:RS and WP:VERIFY). Specifically (again as per my post on my talk page), you wrote:

- "TAG East provides the primary response to terrorism within Australia and its territorial waters" and cited http://www.army.gov.au/Our-work/News-and-media/News-and-media-2012/News-and-media-August-2012/Commandos-put-to-the-test. This does not appear anywhere in this article.
- "Each year as part of the National Counter-Terrorist Committee Skills Enhancement continuum" and cited http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/Mediaandpublications/Publications/Documents/national-counter-terrorism-plan-2012.pdf. I reviewed the document and there is not a single mention of the "National Counter-Terrorist Committee Skills Enhancement continuum" in it.
- Also you cited "https://ausmilitary.com/TAG.htm" for a couple of things; however, this website appears to require a password so I can't login in so there is no where of verifying it. Regardless, I assume it is some sort of blog (so is unlikely to meet the requirements of WP:RS at any rate).

Pls do not add incorrect references again. I have reverted you on several occasions, highlighted the issue to you in discussion and asked you to discuss per WP:BRD which you are required to do before adding the material again. Continuing to conduct yourself in this manner is disruptive and will result in warnings / possible sanctions (see WP:EDITWARRING). By all means if you want to update the article provide ACTUAL references which support your changes, list them here so they can be discussed, and if there is a consensus with other editors make the change. Your personal knowledge of briefings and material you have come across in the course of your employment is not enough. Anotherclown (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

G'day, I had a quick check of a couple of the sources and I can see what AC is saying. Given the topic, we need to be very careful that we are not inferring too much from our sources to the extent that we actually end up saying something that isn't supported by the source. This essentially equates to WP:SYNTH. It maybe accidental, so my suggestion is that changes and references supporting the changes should be discussed first on the talk page to establish consensus prior to inclusion. Adoption of this approach would help to establish collaboration. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tactical assault group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic