Talk:Tacoma Weekly

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Promefac please allow me to add pertinent, positive information to this site edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Twice I've removed unnecessary derogatory information that is inflammatory in nature from this page. Promefac has locked this site to prevent vandalism. Which is warranted but to allow unnecessary derogatory information is unacceptable. I've read through the changes on this page all through the history and find that this page is definitely being harassed by past employees and/or other entities. Using the defunct paper that was never known for it's honest reporting as a legitimate source is questionable at best. I'm going to research more about this newspaper and hope to add more pertinent and productive information. Hopefully, Promefac will unlock it to me to allow this. Shawna2525 (talk) 17:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Shawna2525 Highly unlikely an admin will unprotect it. Instead you need to make an edit request on this talk page explaining exactly what needs to be changed as supported by reliable sources (specifically independent sources.) Praxidicae (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the information. I'll do that. Best wishes to you. Shawna2525 (talk) 17:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic