Talk:Table of the largest known graphs of a given diameter and maximal degree

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Result: Page moved to name without capital letters. ~~ GB fan ~~ 04:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

---

Table of graphs → Table Of Degree-Diameter Graphs

• current name is strikingly uninformative 16:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
• Agree / support. -- Radagast3 (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
• Or better to Table of degree-diameter graphs. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This was an improvement; but it has missed the mark. The subject does not cover "degree-diameter graphs", it covers the size of graphs of a given degree and diameter. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, that's very true, but the most recent move seems to give an excessively long title, which nobody would be likely to type in. If we can't have Table of degree-diameter graphs, I'd suggest something perhaps like Table of largest known degree-diameter graphs, although that's not ideal either. -- Radagast3 (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Which again implies that there is such a thing as a degree-diameter graph. If there were, it would have nothing to do with this table. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

You're right of course. I still feel a shorter title would be better, but I can't think of one addressing that problem. -- Radagast3 (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)