Talk:Table of nuclides (combined)

Unitized table technical glitch

Any isotope with more than 149 neutrons are cut off the table and on the left of the table there are Template:Isotones that aren't transcluided at all. [[User:Tourorist] truied to fix the problem, but it didn't work. Maybve is it because of the new Template transclusion limit ? 86.22.8.235 (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

What's that zigzag???

Halo nuclides? Alfa-ketosav (talk) 16:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Periodic Table future aspects

I am curious to know about the future of periodic table. What are the current researches that are going on? Ananyabanerjee123 (talk) 06:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

• You can see the one of Otto Benfey, already from the 60s. ※ Sobreira ◣◥ ፧ (parlez)⁇﹖ 10:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Unitized table is broken

The lower-right corner of the "Unitized Table" is broken: elements are shifted from their correct positions and the most heavy elements are not shown at all. —46.242.13.224 (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This has been a problem for a long time, and since this was copied on 2 April 2017 to Table of nuclides § Full table, where it works fine, I don't see the need for this page. What's the difference between a "full" table and a "combined" table? I don't see any. – wbm1058 (talk) 21:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Oh, I see. A "combined" table combines Table of nuclides (complete) with the segmented table. Except there isn't just one segmented table. There are Table of nuclides (segmented, wide) and Table of nuclides (segmented, narrow). And, as this page populates Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded, which is why I'm here, there obviously isn't room to combine the full/complete table with any segmented tables. – wbm1058 (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

So the segmented table here is redundant to Table of nuclides (segmented, narrow). Which means that this entire page is redundant. And its broken existence just causes confusion. – wbm1058 (talk) 22:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)