 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Meh edit
This whole page seems like a giant ad for tab mix plus. I'll get around to doing something about it hopefully.
---
I think I may have improved that situation somewhat. The feature list is more objective and less ad-like. Also, I've done a bit of re-formatting. I'll remove the Wikify template, since the article is now formatted similarly to other articles on extensions. Peter T.S. 23:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well add or not, this is required, I can't understand what they hacks who made firefox doesn't include most of this in the client - its basic functionality which is sorely needed. Just trying the new FF3 i realized how pathetic it really is out of the box. --IceHunter (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- I believe we're supposed to discuss editing the page here, not our opinions about the software. That said, the reason it wasn't included is because Firefox was designed to be fast & bloat-free by letting users add the features they wanted; no hacks or patheticness involved. --Xyzzy Avatar 00:10, 17 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.25.89.166 (talk)
- Well add or not, this is required, I can't understand what they hacks who made firefox doesn't include most of this in the client - its basic functionality which is sorely needed. Just trying the new FF3 i realized how pathetic it really is out of the box. --IceHunter (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Well edit
Well, no matter what information should be included to give information about what the extension actually does. I think we should include some information into how the extension came about. I think I can write it a bit later when I have time. We should also really find a better link to the forum. Perhaps an advantage and disadvantage section should be included. GaryR 00:14, 12 June 2006 (CST)
Critisism edit
I'm not sure about that section. Surely the fact that people uninstalled 2.0 for it is a testament to how good it is. It's not their fault it didn't work on 2.0. --89.243.247.0 21:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
The Gmail problem has been solved by changing the preferences of the extension. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.78.217.176 (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
2.0?? I just installed 12. The lack teeth in this section contributes to the sense of advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capricio (talk • contribs) 01:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
First paragraph - Ad? edit
The first paragraph seems more like an ad to me. No offense, but from what I see in this, I don't see any reason why I would want to install it. Then again, I'm using another FF extension that has the same functionality :) As per Mozilla's add-on directory, it is currently registered as the third-top downloda in the Tabs category Boonebytes (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)