Talk:TATB

Chemicals C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Explosives Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correction of incorrect text or diagram edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

NH2 / H2N groups referenced in opening paragraph and molecular diargram do not match. Which is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:B91E:D101:4C87:335E:23EF:45B9 (talk) 17:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Removal of (possibly) incorrect information. edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article claimed that most US nukes used TATB. This is contradicted an article from LLNL saying that "the conventional HE in older weapon systems can be sensitive to extreme shocks," and going on to explain they would possibly incorporate it in the W78 LEP. <ref>[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelwilliamson (talk • contribs) 14:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic