Talk:Tōru Takemitsu/Archive 1

Archive 1

Peer review

After a lot of work, I'm putting this article up for peer review. It's not completely finished, and I would like to put more stuff up. But to keep the ball-rolling, I think some fresh readers and ideas would help. Ps thanks again Noetica for your help reading through and clearing up some of the grammar etc. - Matt.kaner 14:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Title

As far as I know, he didn't wrote any crime fiction. I'd like to know the title/s? Oda Mari 14:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't know the titles of any but if you looked at the references(!) you would see that he must have. Click here and read. You know how wikipedia works. If it says something's true in a peer-reviewed paper, (here Burt, Peter. The Music of Toru Takemitsu (PDF). (Cambridge University Press, 2001), 1.) in this Cambridge University Press - then there is no dispute to be had. And I will have a look for titles to satisfy your curiousity. Matt.kaner 10:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm curious. I hear Burt's book is a very good one. But it's strange. I checked about 200 Takemitsu related sites in Japan, including his friend composer/pianist Yuji Takahashi's homepage [1]. But I found nothing about his crime books. You can look at his book list here [2]. And you can hear his interviews here [3]. Oda Mari 19:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

You're right - it does seem strange. After some investigation I noticed later on in Burt's book that he wrote his detective novels under a pseudonym as a means of making more income whilst with Jikken Kobo. I've emailed someone at the Takemitsu Society to see if they have any more info. Next time they have a meeting I might go along and ask Peter Burt himself - he usually speaks at these things and I'm sure he'll know something. Matt.kaner 10:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Wow! Looking forward to hearing Burt's answer. Oda Mari 15:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Takemitsu 02 Water Music.ogg

THERE IS A RATIONALE. Matt.kaner (talk) 21:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Takemitsu 02 Water Music.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Takemitsu flock descends aleatory.ogg

Image:Takemitsu flock descends aleatory.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Takemitsu litany excerpt.ogg

Image:Takemitsu litany excerpt.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Takemitsu requiem.ogg

Image:Takemitsu requiem.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

November Steps article started

I've started an article on November Steps, but I'm sure much more could be written on the piece. I do not have access to the analytical works, so maybe one of the editors of the Takemitsu article would like to add to November Steps as well? Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 00:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

St Matthew Passion

I see that "Folios for guitar (1974) ... quotes from J. S. Bach's St. Matthew Passion". I've just read (in an old CD review from 1997) that before starting each of his new pieces, Takemitsu would listen to a recording of the St Matthew Passion. The reviewer said "Perhaps it helped to put the world in perspective". Is this alleged practice of Takemitsu's confirmed anywhere else? -- JackofOz (talk) 06:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Not that I've read, but I know he died listening to it... [Burt p. 216] --Matt.kaner (talk) 22:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Query about a sentence

The sentence: "possessed consummate skill in the subtle manipulation of instrumental and orchestral timbre." This is vile writing; absolute crap. An encyclopedia entry should not sound like liner notes written by some hack. Reader, Japan 31 July 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.130.19.15 (talk) 10:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Agreed! Next time you find something like this, please just rephrase it (does us all a favour).--Matt.kaner (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

---

Tōru Takemitsu → Toru Takemitsu — Reasonable to expect disagreement. Article is a current FA and seems to have been at its current name for 5 years. Gimmetoo (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

• The original move request as in Wikipedia:Requested moves#Current requests was "Accidently moved talk page by itself ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 23:09, 27 November 2010 (UTC)", but someone has moved that talk page back to its article. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
• support - might as well. There are plenty of sources that don't use the 'ō' notably including his publisher Schott. Sean.hoyland - talk 07:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose. I don't think his given name is notable so much nor correctly pronounced by English speaking people. Almost all Japanese people do not learn to use macron to write Romaji. And they do not use it because it is needless as they know the difference of long vowels and short vowels as their common knowledge of their native language. I doubt the writers of all those "plenty of sources" seriously thought about romanization and wrote his name without macron. I think his name should be correctly romanized per WP:MJ#Romanization as WP is an encyclopedia. Matsuo Bashō is also a notable person, probably more notable than Takemitsu, but as far as I know, there was no move request. In fact, it was moved from "Matsuo Basho" to "Matsuo Bashō" in 2005. Oda Mari (talk) 09:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
  • WP:MJ, plus much of the evidence posted thus far, show that this article should be moved. See below.
• Support. All of the English language sources quoted in the article appear to write the name without the macron, so it should not be our job to educate English speakers on the "correct romanization" just to please Japanese linguists. --DAJF (talk) 11:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose. As Oda Mari notes, there is an inherent problem in trying to judge these things in terms of how much a romanization form is used. Since newspapers and most popular texts do not use macrons, you can then use that argument to eliminate macrons from most of the Japanese names on Wikipedia. One can argue that the trend is towards using macrons, both on Wikipedia (WP:MJ#Romanization) and in many other texts, but since this is the transition period, the "old" system is still in the majority. Finally, note that the macron is used for Takemitsu on the IMDb. Michitaro (talk) 13:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
• Comment

The followings show "Toru Takemitsu" seems to be more common.

• Google Book search:
  • "Toru Takemitsu" 6,900
  • "Tōru Takemitsu" 1,300
• Encyclopedia:
  • Britannica Toru Takemitsu
  • The Columbia Encyclopedia Toru Takemitsu

By the way, as for Matsuo Bashō, "Matsuo Basho" may be more common.

• Google Book search:
  • "Matsuo Basho" 13,000
  • "Matsuo Bashō" 77
• Encyclopedia:
  • Britannica Bashō
  • The Columbia Encyclopedia Basho

―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 08:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose If Mr. Takemitsu parses his name as "Toru", use that as the page title. Same goes for "Tohru", "Tooru", etc. If there's no common usage by the subject, default to the Hepburn romanization per WP:MOS-JA.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Good point. I think you cannot find the record album with his name printed as "Tōru Takemitsu". ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 06:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I found one.[4] The use of the name may be divided among the albums. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 07:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support If a majority of reliable sources in English use the macron-less form, that is the one that should be used per WP:COMMONNAME. It is the common name the one that should always be used in article titles over a technically correct but rarer form. Jfgslo (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
  • No. In cases like these, the only choices are how the subject chooses to write his name in the Roman alphabet or Hepburn. If he exclusively uses one spelling, Wikipedia should use that spelling. If there is none, Hepburn is the only other choice.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
    • Actually, no. WP:AT is a content policy that applies to all articles in Wikipedia. WP:MOS-JP, where it is stated how the subject chooses to write his name in the Roman alphabet or Hepburn, is a guideline, not above the six main content policies. And the common usage in English sources is also supported by another guideline, WP:EN, and followed by the other language-related guidelines. Furthermore, as cited by others, other encyclopedias also use the macron-less form. Jfgslo (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
      • And why shouldn't we trust the subject of the article as how we should format his name, particularly when his name is originally written in a non-Roman text? If he exclusively used "Tōru Takemitsu", it would be entirely improper to use "Toru Takemitsu" just because reliable sources use that name. It's not like he stuck a random symbol in his name and expects it to be pronounced as another letter. This is in itself an inherent flaw in WP:AT: the subjects of articles are never apparently included as a reliable source as to how their name should be formatted.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
        • Because "Toru Takemitsu" is how he is primarily known in English and this is the English Wikipedia, not the Japanese Wikipedia. We follow the guidelines of the English Wikipedia, which are meant for the general English-speaking public, not for specialists about Japan. And the common names policy applies for every subject, be it a Japanese musician or the US president. Proper, improper or similar formalities have nothing to do with how they are known in the English speaking world. I recommend you to check Talk:Hirohito and read the arguments used there in the recently requested move to use his posthumous name used in Japan over his personal name with which he is known in the English language sources. The same applies here even if it's only a stylistic difference. The subjects of articles are reliable sources on how their name should be formatted within the article text but not on how an article title should be titled because an article title is meant to be used as something recognizable to readers, unambiguous, and consistent with usage in reliable English-language sources. Jfgslo (talk) 04:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
          • I think any of the above discussions are not denying WP:MOSJP#Names of modern figures. Then, as "1. Use the official trade name if available in English/Latin alphabet" does not apply to his name in this case, the most common English name determined by Books, dictionaries and record albums should be used. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 04:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
          • Jfgslo: These are the guidelines of the English Wikipedia as Phoenix7777 quotes the applicable guideline, even though he thinks it doesn't apply (when it most certainly does). If he has an official trade name, we use it. If there is no official trade name, the Hepburn variation is used. And it seems that in some cases, the Hepburn variation is his official trade name. And there is an extremely big difference between "Hirohito" vs. "Emperor Shōwa" and "Toru" vs. "Tōru". And the subject of an article should be the only source to how to spell their name.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
            • But the usage in books do determine that "Toru Takemitsu" is the most commonly used form, not the Hepburn variation. And I repeat, a guideline is not above a policy. WP:AT is a policy that applies to all Wikipedia articles. We first follow WP:AT and after that WP:MOSJP, not the other way around. And there is also another guideline, WP:EN, which clearly establishes "the version of the name of the subject in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works) like Britannica and The Columbia Encyclopedia. And no, the subject of an article does not determine how they are to be referred in article titles. The sources are the real parameter to use in Wikipedia to determine article titles. Jfgslo (talk) 05:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
              • Again, if the subject cannot be taken as a source for how to spell his god damn name, our article naming policies have a big problem and need to be fixed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                • Try telling that to people at Sergei Rachmaninoff...(though that one has other reasons to be named that). ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                • Ryūlóng, I'm intrigued by your references to how he wrote his name in the Roman alphabet. He never struck me as the kind of person that cared about such things as macrons. What sources are you thinking of ? Sean.hoyland - talk 08:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                  • There's a link higher up where someone found an album cover where his given name is parsed as "Tōru".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                    • Ah okay, I thought you were looking at a hand written score or something like that. I have one in front of me. It says 'dedicated to Kiyoshi Shōmuri' with the macron and Toru Takemitsu is written without the macron....but it's probably handwritten by someone at Editions Salabert rather than Takemitsu so that doesn't help at all... My 'Schott Japan' scores don't use the macron so I guess this is set to run and run. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                • Then I guess Britannica, The Columbia Encyclopedia, The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music, Cambridge University Press and other similar sources also have a naming policy problem. Also, did he personally asked to use "Tōru Takemitsu" or is that how older albums romanized his name? Because if there are other albums that use the macron-less form then that is not his personal preference. Jfgslo (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                  • For the last god damn time, using independent third party sources regarding how to format a person's name does not help at all.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                    • So you say, but you have not brought a good reason to ignore reliable sources in English in favor of using a technically correct but not commonly used article title that is not present in the rest of the reliable English sources. And again, this would be favoring a guideline over a policy and also ignoring another guideline. If other encyclopedias used the name with macrons, this discussion would not have sense. But it has been shown that the macron-less form is more commonly used. I repeat, article titles are not meant for specialist, but for the general public. And I've confirmed that other albums of Takemitsu do not use the macron so it isn't his personal preference either. Jfgslo (talk) 21:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
                      • The policy should be ameliorated from this mistake.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
• Support per WP:COMMONNAME. Flamarande (talk) 03:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose The current form is perfectly recognisable. "Most sources" are distorted by ō being difficult to type. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:MJ (Names of modern figures). The Manual of Style lays down the following guideline:

“ Spelling, including macron usage, of the name of a modern figure should adhere to the following, in order of preference:

1. Use the official trade name if available in English/Latin alphabet;
2. Use the form found in a dictionary entry from a generally accepted English dictionary;
3. Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world;
4. Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in any other popular Latin-alphabet-using language (French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, German, and Dutch, or variations); or
5. If none of the above is available, use the macronned form.

”

It seems to me that the artist's trade name is without macron (as demonstrated by the publisher of his music, Schott, as well as numerous album covers save one); if this is truly debatable, his name as found in a dictionary/encylopedia (Britannica, etc.) is without macron; if this is also considered debatable, his name as generally used on his behalf is clearly without macron (ie, most of the sources for this article). The majority of evidence, combined with the applicable guideline, it seems to me, weighs in heavily in favor of removing the macron.Erudy (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Messaien-takemitsu quatrain compared.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Messaien-takemitsu quatrain compared.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)