This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Assyria, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Considering no one knows who wrote the books of the bible or when, and that the oldest manuscripts we have are from about 150 BC, with the Great Isaiah Scroll dating from 125 BC, so some 600 years after this war, how can these references be trusted? Or used to back up a so called prophecy written long after the event? As the Wikipedia points out, Genesis (the oldest book of the bible) dates from sixth to fourth century BC when the final draft was made, and Revelation 22:18-19 on the last page of the bible warns against changing the story, something bible scholars know happened, can any bible book be used as a trustworthy reference for any serious historical article? (88.3.114.28 (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC))Reply