This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I've reverted the bold addition of an inappropriate infobox. This was a diplomatic crisis, not a military conflict. 2.49.39.17 (talk) 07:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I changed the word "military" to "civil" in the infobox definition just to make you happy. Same information and the infobox has become an established part of the article. Do not remove the infobox again, and if you continue with these meaningless disruption, you will be blocked. // Timothy :: talk 07:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
That breaks it, and it's not an established part of the article, there have been hardly any edits since its addition. 2.49.39.17 (talk) 08:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Its not broken. You are just being a nuisance. // Timothy :: talk 08:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is broken - look at it 2.49.39.17 (talk) 08:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The image in the infobox is out of scope - it's from 1958 after the end of this crisis and it's misleading to use it to illustrate it 2.49.39.17 (talk) 09:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
