This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
I agree with the above poster. I've flagged this article for NPOV checking. The issues are, as I can see them:
Too much emphasis on Calvinist critique of Arminian theology, with no information about how the Arminians view the critiqued ideas
No emphasis at all on the "important part" synergy plays in Eastern Orthodox theology, despite having a sentence about it
Could most of this article be merged into another article on Calvinism?
64.80.108.55 (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have made a first attempt to remedy the second of the above complaints. I disagree with the other, since the Arminian (and Wesleyan) view is given more space than the Calvinist critique of it. Esoglou (talk) 14:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply