Talk:Symphony No. 5 (Nielsen)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by OboeCrack in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A well-written, well-referenced article. The WP:Lead is rather sparse. It acts as an Introduction, which is one of its functions, but is not all that good at providing a summary of the main points, which is its other function.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Overall, I'm marking this article as GA-compliant. The WP:Lead however is rather weak: I suggest that it is expanded - there is no mention of performances, for example. Pyrotec (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I was going to say the same about the lead, please expand it a little. Congrats, OboeCrack (talk) 15:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply