Talk:Symphonies by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky

Merge proposal

This proposal does not seem to come with any justification from its proposer. The article should not be merged. It is a substantial article in its own right, and to merge it wuith the biographical article would significantly unbalance the latter.--Smerus (talk) 12:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

• Leave separate: I agree with Smerus regarding this article. Merging the information here with the main Tchaikovsky article would seriously unbalance the article. This was the reason the information was split into a linked article in the first place. Jonyungk (talk) 18:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Should add a link here from the navigation template

If a link to here was added to Template:Tchaik byovsky symphonies, then this nice article would be easier to find.DavidRF (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I guess its already there! Sorry about that. Its hard to find though. Would it help putting the link down below by the "list of works" link?DavidRF (talk) 22:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Objectivity and faux-legitimacy of some claims

And I quote: "The Sixth Symphony, generally interpreted as a declaration of despair, is a work of prodigious originality and power and is perhaps one of Tchaikkovsky's most consistent and perfectly composed works." Perhaps it's perfectly composed - a book says so, so it must be...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tancrisism (talk • contribs) 10:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The Sonata Form

Most of the article hinges on the concept of the sonata form. A definition would be helpful, because if you're not already enlightened, most of the article makes no sense. Nei1 (talk) 23:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)