Talk:Syeda Ghulam Fatima
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 67.82.172.191 in topic Why was there a detailed account of one journalist's issue with the person in question?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Syeda Ghulam Fatima article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Why was there a detailed account of one journalist's issue with the person in question? edit
Half of Fatima's page was dedicated to an article written by a journalist who did not support the human rights work Fatima was doing. This is biased information that doesn't belong in a Wiki article.
67.82.172.191 (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC)milkywayuser
- The central reason she merits an entry on Wikipedia is her work on bonded labor. The journalist (who presented pictures and other various documents) calls that work into question: it may be a scam. This information clearly belongs on the page.
- That the journalist may not support her work is a straw man. Just because the journalist does not support the work does not make the pictures & documentation cease to exist. Outright asserting that the journalist is biased (and therefore the reporting invalid) is unjustified. Where are the articles that show the output of her work? Where are the pictures of the structures that have been built, the cases that have been resolved? When that information and reporting appears, then that information should be ADDED to the page, showing that the allegations were debunked.
Torsionalmetric (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- No pictures or documentation were included in the citations. Only an article making claims with no evidence to back them up.
67.82.172.191 (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)milkywayuser