Talk:Switched at Birth (1991 film)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by GTBacchus in topic Requested move to make way for disambiguation

References edit

The merge removed a number of references. For an article discussing a living person, this is unacceptable. doc, you should know better. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 02:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree. If you want to leave out some of the details of her later life, fine, but please cite the information you HAVE included. There are news articles that are readily available. --Bookworm857158367 05:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:SwitchedatBirth.jpg edit

 

Image:SwitchedatBirth.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 08:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move to make way for disambiguation edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved and adjustments made, per discussion. - GTBacchus(talk) 22:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


Switched at BirthSwitched at Birth (film) – With the TV show and the actual concept of being switched at birth, I think we have a little bit of a confused mess here. I think the best way to straighten it out is to move this article and redirect Switched at Birth to the new switched at birth disambiguation page I just created. (N.B.: That title was previously a redirect to Babies switched at birth.) Powers T 12:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Support because the series is actually primary to the film. Note that it is allowed to have two similar articles if they are treated with different capitalization. Marcus Qwertyus 00:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Allowed, but in this case, I don't think it's ideal. As for the series, I think it's too new to judge its relative popularity at this point in time. Powers T 01:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Agree that there isn't a clear primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 08:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.