Talk:Swiss Global Air Lines

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:Swiss logo.png

Update

edit

Removed the information about Lufthansa City Line because it is incorrect. At the same time corrected the information about ownership with reference to the Swiss registry of commerces.

Corrected one more typo and punctuation. 23 August 2014.

Untitled

edit

I guess it is better to let it as it is now.

It's the same thing like

  • Lufthansa <-> Lufthansa Regional/City Line
  • Austrian Airlines <-> Austrian Arrows
  • Alitalia <-> Alitalia Express
  • LOT <-> Eurolot
  • KLM <-> KLM Cityhopper
  • Air France <-> Régional/Brit Air
  • Iberia <-> Air Nostrum


No. Swiss fully owns Swiss European. It has the same CEO. There is no real difference.

In fact SWU is even more fully integrated into the operation and training. There is only one dispatch for both companies and the various fleets, one crew planning and so on. 23 August 2014.

Corrected a couple of typos Prijs 04:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Swiss logo.png

edit
 

Image:Swiss logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply