Talk:Swan Lake Nature Study Area
 | Swan Lake Nature Study Area was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 7, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that humans have lived near Nevada's Swan Lake Nature Study Area since 400 AD? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Failed GAN edit
Sorry, but this article doesn't pass the quick fail-criteria. It is too short, not very well referenced, and altogether not even close to being ready to becoming a good article yet. Thanks for the time, and I hope to see this article expanded into a GA in the future. --Meldshal [Chat] 17:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- It's a small topic with a correspondingly small article. What, precisely, would you recommend adding to the article? As to references, all the content is referenced from reliable sources. In what respect is it not well-referenced?--ragesoss (talk) 17:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I meant generally that 3 references (they all should be reliable, anyway) is not enough for a good article, in some cases, that is not even good enough for a B-class article. I would be glad to help you find some references. Why doesn't anyone ask anymore? I'll find some refs. --Meldshal [Chat] 17:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- I appreciate that. I haven't looked into references since I created this article, and there may be some new useful ones out there. The number of references, per se, however, is not one of the good article criteria. Small articles need correspondingly less referencing; this has one reference per paragraph, which is typical of Good and even many Featured articles.--ragesoss (talk) 18:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I meant generally that 3 references (they all should be reliable, anyway) is not enough for a good article, in some cases, that is not even good enough for a B-class article. I would be glad to help you find some references. Why doesn't anyone ask anymore? I'll find some refs. --Meldshal [Chat] 17:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Here is one: http://www.reno.com/article/20070228/RECREATION10/70228002
You'll have to scroll down a bit for that one.
You can also use other subpages from your first reference. --Meldshal [Chat] 18:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Swan Lake Nature Study Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928141606/http://www.nevadaaudubon.org/birdingguide/birdingareas/swanlake.html to http://www.nevadaaudubon.org/birdingguide/birdingareas/swanlake.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928141606/http://www.nevadaaudubon.org/birdingguide/birdingareas/swanlake.html to http://www.nevadaaudubon.org/birdingguide/birdingareas/swanlake.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)