Talk:Svinfylking

Military history: Technology / European / Nordic / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Norse history and culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a slight coherence problem. Svinfylking is identified as a Viking tactic, and then the Roman counter tactic is discussed... But the Vikings and the Romans were not contemporary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.169.28 (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

My understanding is that this was a 'Germanic' tactic, insofar as we can claim such a thing. It is mentioned, with a Latin name, in Tacitus' Germania, and the Old Norse term is assumed to be a native name for the same formation in later times. I shall look into editing the article accordingly. Arkitype (talk) 18:57, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge with or add to Flying wedge

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page Flying wedge mentions, like many articles, some different names of the wedge. One of the alternate names is the svinfylking, and this article is linked. However, looking over this page and the flying wedge page, it would seem that the description given for svinfylking is essentially the same as the flying wedge. The FW page even lists different uses in history such as the Romans, Germans, and others. Reading this page, the svinfylkin is actually one of the more wedge-like and standard version, unlike the prehistoric Germanic tribes which were closer to a rectangle. The paragraph or two that this article consists of could be trimmed and would fit nicely into that article. I am not a deletionist by any means, but this seems fairly cut and dry to me, seeing as the article sites no references and is a small stub. I think the information specific to the Viking version is important, but would be better placed in the other article (in which it's already mentioned as a variant). Either way, just my $.02 184.156.23.123 (talk) 01:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

This article really seems like it should be deleted or merged with the Flying wedge page. It doesn't seem to merit being an independent topic and might be more informative included with the other page rather than listed separately. Anyway, 9+ years after the initial suggestion...should this happen?

If there's no objection in the next few weeks, I'll add a relevant section to the other page and mark this one for deletion. Iandaandi (talk) 03:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic