 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Objection to the template on deletion suggestion referring to "original research": If it was only for the attempt to popularize the Master Thesis, this article could have been published in May 2007. But in fact, there are two of third-party peer-reviewed articles referred, both published in books (Abrahamsson, 2006 and 2008, notes 1 and 14), with the concept developed. Secondly, the origin of the concept is not mine, the term was first coined in 2000 by Professor Stefan Schaltegger (see note 5). I edit the article on one point to meet this template tagging - I take away the link to the Master Thesis. And, yes, this happening right now is a part of the "enactive research process" referring "future development"!
Your comments welcome! Andersabrahamsson (talk) 15:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Now I have shorened the notes on the thesis, and added ISBN numbers to the peer-reviewed sources cited in the article, meeting Wikipedia standards of citing third-party sources, to further my argument it is not based on original, but peer-reviewed research. See history/edit notes. Andersabrahamsson (talk) 19:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)