Untitled

edit

This article has the potential to be very successful. The lead section sets up the article for success, outlining what the article is going to be about. The article does a great job referencing historical events. It may help to further organize this section about the history of sustainability, as there is a lot of information to unpack. On the other hand, the section about careers in sustainability could be further developed. Jkierna6 (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Jkierna6Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2018 and 4 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yasmineeyehia, Caelanmcmichael.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Sustainability science with Sustainability studies

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Articles cover same topic. Both emphasize academic course offerings. The "studies" article only cites a few sources and does not distinguish itself. Bluerasberry (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Totally agree; these articles should be merged. GnocchiFan (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The random copy editing suggestion box brought me here, but I'd rather not spend time copy editing a bunch of text that is about to be deleted in a merge anyway. Is there some way I can help with the merge? Aurodea108 (talk) 22:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Aurodea108, if this merge proposal was closed as merge, you could help by copying over content from Sustainability science to Sustainability studies. But I'm going to close this as no consensus. QueenofHearts 05:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

No vote: Allow me to point out that there are many people out there on the postmodern side of the fence who may approach sustainability more from an emotional or quasi-religious foundation than from a rational foundation. We used to have trickle-down economics. Recently we seem to have replaced that with trickle-over sustainability. You sometimes see people behaving as if they believe that assembling enough IDE around the table will cause sustainability to magically happen, but this time a magical Marxist hand, rather than Adam Smith's much maligned paw; in both cases equally difficult to explicate directly. — MaxEnt 05:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. While clearly related, the emphases of Sustainability Studies and Sustainability Science programs and courses are sufficiently different to merit separate articles, in my opinion. It would be important to clearly define those distinctions for both articles. (In my view, the distinction would be between more humanistic, humanities, and philosophical studies, on the one hand; and more empirical, scientific, and natural science based emphases, on the other.) DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki Education assignment: Environmental and Climate Justice

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chelseasprinkler (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Chelseasprinkler (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply