Talk:Surprise Attack (film)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Sdkb in topic Embedding film?
 | A fact from Surprise Attack (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
Surprise Attack (1951) titles
- ... ... that British film Surprise Attack (titles pictured) warned of the danger of not being vaccinated against infectious diseases?
- Reviewed: One Voice at Christmas
Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 10:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC).
Interesting article about a short film, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. In the hook, I'd provide at least a year, and perhaps say "official" and/or "short". The prominent actor for the physician might also add, no? I don't get why "titles" are pictured, seeing only one. - In the article, I see too many gallery pics too small to mean anything. Perhaps better fewer and larger? The one-sentence "Reception" looks strange, - perhaps combine with what follows? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you kindly @Gerda Arendt:... I have amended as per your suggestions. Pinging @Philafrenzy: to edit hook and clear images. Whispyhistory (talk) 12:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda, I was trying to keep the hook punchy and relevant to current affairs. I don't think it needs to be any longer or distract by mentioning the lead actor. I will look at the gallery but don't feel that there is much wrong there either. Can you approve it as it stands? Philafrenzy (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
sure --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Embedding film? edit
Nice article! Since the film is in the domain, would it make sense to embed it somewhere on the page, rather than having it just be an external link at the bottom where it's less likely to be noticed? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 00:37, 7 December 2020 (UTC)