This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I've been told that it was this decision that the court stated that it was almost never appropriate to extradite people to a country where they may be tortured. The "almost", I am told, has been been milked heavily by the government and has become a contentious point. I think it may be something worth looking into. --PullUpYourSocks 15:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The same goes, I imagine, with United States v. Burns, which found that in certain circumstances, which the Court declined to speculate on, the death penalty would be OK. Highly probable there will be future "landmark" Supreme Court cases on these. CanadianCaesarEt tu, Brute? 22:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
