This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI removed the notability tag, because I don't quite understand the problem. Could someone explain to me why this article doesn't meet the notability guidelines, and, say, the SlySoft one does? I see no evidence of 'significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject' for that article either. There are many more articles that have the same issue.
- Mistakes in other articles abound. However, all articles should have secondary sources. A secondary source could be as simple as a link to a review of their product or a newspaper article on them. Blast Ulna (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK, well I've added a secondary link now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jez9999 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Orphan article message
editPlease help this orphan article by adding links to it in related articles and lists. Once it has an incoming link from at least one article or list, the orphan tag can be removed (disambiguation pages, redirects and draft articles do not count). Three or more incoming links are ideal. The Find link tool may help, but not in all cases.