Talk:Superinsulation

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Units of Measure

edit

In the article, are the given R values in imperial or SI units? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.60.112.134 (talk) 16:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Imperial. An SI R-value of 40 or 60 would be ridiculously high. I've added SI U-values. EdDavies (talk) 16:30, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article refers to values with the notation "Rip40", but what does this mean? This unit is hyperlinked to the article "R-value (insulation)", but that article contains no reference to or explanation of the notation "Rip". That article does indicate the notation variant "RSI" instead of "R" to differentiate S.I. (metric) values from U.S. values. But "R" alone is ambiguous in this article unless the article states what units are used. Perhaps in this article we could give both parenthetically, e.g., "R-40 (RSI-7)"? (Conversion formulae are given in the article R-value (insulation).) In fact, with a little research I found that in Canada (probably the country most likely to need to differentiate, given its use of the metric system but also the extensive trade in building materials with the U.S.), all insulation is labelled both in customary values (designated "R") and metric values (designated "RSI"); see https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/grho/grho_010.cfm. Therefore I will update this article to follow this same convention.

Physics

edit
Sounds like there should be a new article, superinsulation (physics), with links back and forth.Ccrrccrr (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Superinsulation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply