Talk:Superficial (album)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Superficial (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
editi dont think she knows what a double entendre is —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.46.88 (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Referencing problems
edit- The statement "Superficial was released on January 11, 2010" is not supported by the reference.[1]
- US Weekly can hardly be considered a reliable source.
- What is ref #17 " heidi-montag-lets-hang-miss-universe-performance" supposed to mean? Jezhotwells (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Superficial (album)
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Superficial (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "BPI":
- From List of music recording certifications: "The BPI". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 2008-06-02.
- From 21 (Adele album): "Certified Awards Search". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
- From British Phonographic Industry: Gallup (4 February 1989). "The Top of the Pops Chart" (PDF). Record Mirror: 4. Retrieved 16 July 2010.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
"Editing War"
editObviously, there's quite the "editing war" going on here. Improving Wiki pages is something I do when I'm sitting around the house with nothing better to do. That being said, I noticed that both the Heidi Montag page and the Superficial page looked pretty bad (no offense to whoever made it) compared to other articles. There's A LOT of info on both Montag and the album that wasn't featured in the article, so I input that information and modeled the page after other more popular albums. All of the information is sourced (and I'm not the one who stated that the album won a Grammy, and I also didn't post the charts and certifications). That being said, I think the article should stay the way I edited it. It's a good looking article, I believe, and all of the information is sourced, and most of the info I put in has more than one source. That being said, I'll quit reverting the edits until we come to a final decision.
- You can't use blogs and fansites to add information to the article, they are unreliable. That pretty much breaks the WP:V rule. Also, can you please sign your comments with the four tildes so people will know who it is that's commenting? Till 02:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- I did not realize that I was using fansites, I only looked at the information included in the sourced articles! Sorry. /: Sethjohnson95 Talk 22:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- You additionally added the album charting at number one everywhere and selling billions of copies worldwide. Statυs (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't add that information to the page. I actually didn't even add a "Charts and Certifications" section, as it only charted on one chart (the Heatseekers chart) therefore I only covered that in the "reception" section. I also didn't say the album won a Grammy. When I reverted the edits back, I didn't notice those, but quickly removed them from the article.
- Forgot to add my sig. Sethjohnson95 Talk 23:26, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't add that information to the page. I actually didn't even add a "Charts and Certifications" section, as it only charted on one chart (the Heatseekers chart) therefore I only covered that in the "reception" section. I also didn't say the album won a Grammy. When I reverted the edits back, I didn't notice those, but quickly removed them from the article.
- You additionally added the album charting at number one everywhere and selling billions of copies worldwide. Statυs (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- I did not realize that I was using fansites, I only looked at the information included in the sourced articles! Sorry. /: Sethjohnson95 Talk 22:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- You can't use blogs and fansites to add information to the article, they are unreliable. That pretty much breaks the WP:V rule. Also, can you please sign your comments with the four tildes so people will know who it is that's commenting? Till 02:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Superficial (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090628131851/http://celebrity.lovetoknow.com:80/Heidi_Montag_Unhappy_About_Song_Leak to http://celebrity.lovetoknow.com/Heidi_Montag_Unhappy_About_Song_Leak
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091025232905/http://www.amazon.com:80/Here-She-Is/dp/B002KU96U8 to http://www.amazon.com/Here-She-Is/dp/B002KU96U8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)