Talk:Super Twins
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Twins article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article was nominated for deletion on February, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Plagiarizing-Paraphrasing edit
Could someone please rewrite the synopsis of this article? It reads like a very badly paraphrased version of this [1]. As a teacher, I'd already nick this for plagiarizing (again), but I'll give this some time. Shrumster 08:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Paraphrasing is allowed anyway. Plagarizing verbatim isn't. --Howard the Duck 08:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- But this level and/or quality of "paraphrasing" is tantamount to plagiarism. Just changing the order of words/swapping out for synonyms while retaining the same sentence and paragraph structure is not paraphrasing, at least where I come from. That's downright slacker-style plagiarism. Shrumster 20:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
What happened to the rest of this talk page? edit
Just out of curiosity. --GracieLizzie 15:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- The whole article (including the talk page) had been deleted because of copyright violations. So I decided to create it again, but this time, I created it from scratch. (The original version was not started by me, however.) Then other editors contributed and cleaned up this article. :-) Perryv 08:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Restored. —Centrx→talk • 16:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't know about the history of proposals for deleting this article. Thanks for restoring the archive. -- Perryv 17:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Adding unsourced materiel edit
Please don't edit war over adding unsourced materiel. Please discuss here instead of simply reverting when other editors revert your change. JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)