Talk:Sunsets (song)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Natg 19 in topic Requested move 29 October 2015
Good articleSunsets (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2007Good article nomineeListed

Deletion of Sunsets edit

23:05, 21 August 2007 Wimt (talk | contribs) deleted page Sunsets (delete to make way for redirect)

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yay. Dihydrogen Monoxide 06:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA review edit

Sorry this article is being quick failed for being such an awful song ;p, anyway here we go,

  • I think everyone knows what a week is so no need to wikilink it
Removed.
  • In an interview with Undercover magazine, "Undercover" is a periodical thus should be in italics
Done.
  • Powderfinger again worked with producer Nick DiDia, who had accompanied the band on previous albums - the "again" is redundant because you say he worked with the band on previous albums after the comma (which albums also) and the repetition of previously is not good, how about something like "Nick Didia returned to the producer's chair after working with the band on the albums, X and Y. Brendan OBrien, who had worked with Didia on (Whatever they worked on goes here), mixed the song in Atlanta Georgia."
Reworded - the source simply says that OBrien and DiDia worked together...[1]
Done
  • I suggest merging the last two paragraphs in "Recording and production" as they both describe elements of the album
Merged.
  • An acoustic video for "Sunsets" has also appeared - a song "appearing" sounds wrong how about, An acoustic video for "Sunsets" was featured on the etc
Featured it is.
  • No need to link review
Removed.
  • This review [2] is not by a critic it is by a user of the site, i made the same mistake too awhile ago ;p
Reworded to emphasise contributor, but kept.
  • no need to link music video, anyone reading this article will know what one is
Fixed.
  • The video shows one of the King's ten son's -> sons
Fixed.
  • For the sound sample you will need a better caption than "20 second sample from "Sunsets"", something like "20 second sample from "Sunsets" showing the aggressive lyrics and rythm as said by reviewer of magazine/website.
Added.
  • Since the Sputnik review is gone i suggest merging the review paragraphs together and create a paragraph for the chart positions and awards, and remove the tables. Up to you though but since there is such a small amount of positions and awards it may be better to write it.
Nah, I prefer it as a table.
  • 2004 ARIA ARIA Music Awards Best Group Nominated - If they were nominated for Best Group i take it the award does not relate to this song receiving the award?
See the source - song is mentioned alongside "Best Group"
  • Youtube links are copyright infringements as they are uploaded by a normal user, not the official record company. Just use "Sunsets" video clip - Powerfinger, Record Company or something
OK.
  • [3] is not a reliable source, what is it sourcing btw?
It was sourcing track listing, but I removed it as there was another one.
  • With authors in references the last name comes first so Jason MacNeil should be, Macneil, Jason

That be all, feel free to message me if you disagree with anything.

Fixed

M3tal H3ad (talk) 06:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fixed stuff up. Dihydrogen Monoxide 06:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Pass. M3tal H3ad (talk) 07:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 29 October 2015 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


SunsetsSunsets (song)WP:ASTONISH. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom. Redirect to the singular after move-- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 03:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per In ictu oculi.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, obvious. Randy Kryn 11:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Astonishing. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Question: to play devil's advocate, what is so astonishing about an article unrelated to "sunset" being at the plural "sunsets"? Surely not many people looking for the article about the Sun setting will type "sunsets", will they? For those that do, there is a hatnote at the top. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per page view statistics. sst✈discuss 09:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.