Talk:Sunny Lee/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   In the Storylines section, there's something odd with this sentence ---> "Sunny believes that she has humiliated herself and decides to find out who 'Lost Boy' he is". Same section, "However, Zeke moves out, so Sunny's parents won't worry about them" ---> "However, Zeke moves out, so Sunny's parents will not worry about them".

    Done Hopefully fixed.

   Yup, and check.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

   In the Characterisation section, please link "aloof" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as a disambiguation. Same section, "...Lee said that Sunny took a 'sacrifice' in leaving as she didn't want her parents turning up and ruining everyone's lives" ---> "...Lee said that Sunny took a 'sacrifice' in leaving as she did not want her parents turning up and ruining everyone's lives", per here.

    Done I've linked "aloof" to it's entry at wiktionary, is that okay? It doesn't have an article here. I can always unlink it though, I don't think it's that important. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 20:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

   Check, and the aloof linkage is fine with me, though, it's really all up to you on the linking, since it's your article.

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   The link title in References 25 should not be in all capitals, per here.

    Done

   Check.

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, how did I fail to notice you had taken this on? Lol. Thank you for your review, I'll get working on the points you raised. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 19:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

With the changes done i also support GA status for the article. Congrats.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, the decision falls with me, as I'm the reviewer, so thank you to JuneGloom for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) Also, you're welcome for the review. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)