Talk:Sun Quan

Please separate history from fiction

I wringed everytime I came across "In fact, according to Romance of the three kingdoms". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neoxese (talk • contribs) 12:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Sun Quan...Wu Ruler of Jiang Dong

===With the deaths of Sun Jian and Sun Ce, Sun Quan was left to continue the foundation and take control of the Wu army. Although Sun Quan is a great ruler for the throne of Wu, one of the faults I see within Wu overall is letting an inexperience man take over rather than not letting a more capable person handle the fights. (Suggestion Zhou Yu)

The Rise of Sun Quan! A Force to be Reckoned With!

===At the battle of the Red Cliffs (Chi Bi), Sun Quan accepted an alliance between Wu and Liu Bei to defeat Cao Cao's massive army. With Zhou Yu, Zhuge Liang, Pang Tong, and Huang Gai using superior strategy, this battle helped establish Sun Quan as a powerful fiqure.The Sun family's only fault that I believe is the fact that the war for them went from Sun Jian to Sun Ce to Sun Quan and maybe even Sun ShangXiang. I suppose though when ya family is in the war nothing will ever stop the desire to bring peace back to the land. --Jin Mai 03:21, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

===Interesting point, about the first one. However, the whole point of Eastern Wu was for the Sun family to rule. You contradicted yourself by proving this in the second paragraph: when your family is involved in the war, nothing will ever stop the desire to bring peace to the land. Also, Sun Shangxiang never actually fought, or was a ruler. After Sun Quan died, Sun Liang took over, then Sun Xiu, and so on until Wu was taken over by Jin in 280. --User:Cao Wei 1:17 AM, Sunday April 16th 2006

The Sun Family

If there is one thing, from the novel, that I admire about the Sun Family is how carefully and well-planned they were at times of battle or up-coming battles. Although Sun Jian and Sun Ce suffer horrible deaths, Sun Quan with his veteran generals still continued to fight against the hordes of the Wei army and kept a watchful eye on Shu. I say once more with feeling, Wu may have not been the best out of the kingdoms, but it was the most balance out of the two kingdoms. --Zhang Liao 19:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Its hard to say any state was best, but T'sao T'sao was constantly made the worst one (he was probably the most brutal against people who didn't join him and didn't agree with him), and Liu Bei's state is constantly uplifted as he's the only one with legitimate claim. However, they're not devoid of fault as they still do things like seize their allies's supplies to attack. Sun Ch'uan's forces tend to be the most 'angry' and 'strategic', as they are portrayed in ROTK, but fairly neutral in terms of good vs evil. T'sao T'sao did have the major good point of modernizing a large chunk of China with forced agriculture using his soldiers in his policies.Annihilatron (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Liu and Sun

Out of respect for these two, and anyone carrying an Asian-stemmed name, call them by their proper names. Sun and Liu are clans, and not the names of Bei and Quan themselves. If the shortforms are to be used (Just the first name) don't use the clan. This goes for any notable general, really. It's not proper Japanese/Chinese/Korean/Vietnamese, and it's not proper english either. I've changed as many as I've found, up to the breaking of the alliances, but this isn't the only page. Anyways, we want this to be as accurate as possible, and this is how we're going to get that. 70.50.197.140 15:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Joe Caron

Family names are proper English usage. This claim is simply bizarre. --Nlu (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:LEDE too long

I'm not gonna slap one of those annoying/obnoxious "lede too long" templates atop the article, but the lede really does need to be condensed. A lot of the content that's there can probably be moved down into the body...

...and before you say {{sofixit}}, I probably will fix it ... a couple months from now. But I'm putting this in Talk in case anyone wants to take care of it before I do. :-) --Ling.Nut 23:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Deceased... when?

There are different statements about the date of his death. ja:孫権 says April 16th, zh:孙权 says May 21st. Which may be accurate? Sarazyn • 丁人LK • DE 07:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Emperor of China ¿?

Was Sun Quan emperor of China as the succession box (bottom of the article) indicates??? Actually not none of the Three Kingdom era emperors were Emperors of China, only emperors of their Kingomds. Armando.O^{talk • Ev} 02:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

File:Sun Quan 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Sun Quan 2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sun Quan 2.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:SunQuanWu.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:SunQuanWu.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:SunQuanWu.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sun Quan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607210632/http://www.anu.edu.au/asianstudies/decrespigny/gos_index.html to http://www.anu.edu.au/asianstudies/decrespigny/gos_index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Help me, please.

I can't do it now... 궁대균 (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

I restored the infobox for now. What are you attempting to change? Red Phoenix ^talk 15:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)