Talk:Sun's curious identity
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Alexbar in topic below encyclopedic standard?
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest and neutral point of view. |
Untitled edit
Surely we all know Ekhad is not a person - perhaps we should link this to Zeilberger? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.6.168.245 (talk) 21:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
below encyclopedic standard? edit
Are comments like "sophisticated identity" not completely out of place in an encyclopedia? Also, the sentence "This shows that the identity of Sun is a good example for various advanced tools used to prove combinatorial identities." has, in my opinion, no place in an encyclopedic entry. Any objections to deleting at least that sentence, to give this entry some semblence of serious information? --Alexbar (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)