Talk:Summa
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2600:1702:27F0:9190:649F:F8A2:8318:9BCE in topic Merge from Summa (genre)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Summa (genre) page were merged into Summa on 4 May 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge from Summa (genre) edit
Essentially the same topic, and even almost same coverage. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Definitely makes sense to merge. Not sure why there are two separate articles. --Caorongjin (talk) 08:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
2600:1702:27F0:9190:649F:F8A2:8318:9BCE (talk) 16:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC) Note that the text to which Footnote 1 refers contains nothing to support the categorical claim made at that point in the article.