Talk:Sumata

Query

How "dry" would this sex act be if she is rubbing her labia majora up against your penis?! I have doubts... Mathmo ^Talk 07:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Question

Umm does it have to be bewteen a sex worker and a man, or can it be bewteen a woman and a man to be sumata..For example on numerous occasions my girl friend has done this Landlord77 (talk) 21:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Do Not Merge Sumata with Intercrural Sex

Sumata and intercrural sex are obviously two different activities -- intercrural is strictly "male partner places penis between partner's thighs and thrusts" which simulates intercourse. It involves legs and thrusting. Sumata is more a form of frottage by the female on the male, using different body parts. Lap dancing versus thigh humping. Sumata is not simulated intercourse. If you muddy the difference between Sumata and Intercrural Sex, then you might as well throw in titty fucking (mammary intercourse) and hand jobs into the same article. Probably throw in that thing foot fetishists have done to them too... foot jobs? Could probably thrown in tribadism too. 76.243.129.217 (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

That is incorrect. Intercural intercourse can and indeed does take place between males and females. In fact, the Japanese article for sumata mentions the fact it can be practiced by both homosexuals and heterosexuals.

There isn't much sense in having two separate articles, in all honesty. Simply redirect Sumata to Intercrural sex and do the same thing with the template. It's pretty simple, really. -- Ishikawa Minoru (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

What? No! Based on the description currently given in this article, this is not even close to synonymous with intercrural sex! And IP-address-person didn't say intercrural sex was necessarily between men, just that it had to be performed by a man, which seems accurate enough? If sumata can be a gay thing, the description given here is pretty poor. Does it really just mean the same thing as frottage? --Oolong (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I will agree that I've seen some things that confuse sumata with intercrural sex, although this may be a translation issue. In my case, it was a scanlation of a yaoi manga that referred to the action the two male characters had just performed as sumata or "fake fucking" when they'd clearly been having intercrural sex. IsaacSapphire (talk) 06:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sumata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111121165227/https://wcfia.harvard.edu/us-japan/research/pdf/06-11.sanders.pdf to http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/us-japan/research/pdf/06-11.sanders.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)