 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Logical course of action edit
The named partners (come to) know that Mike Ross is not what he seems - and that there is a legal case against him. It would be within their collective wisdom to set up some sleight of hand which enables MR to get a legal qualification and 'a Harvard post-grad qualification', thus fulfilling the spirit of their recruitment policy. Then, when the court case begins they know that the verdict may go against MR - but they do nothing to constrain the legal persons within the firm from departing abruptly (let alone the accountants, cleaners HSE people etc), and everybody departs without collecting their payslips or considering the effect that such a mass flow of persons will have on the markets. 85.115.54.202 (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Ratings edit
Somebody changes all the ratings in every suits season!!! Judor92 (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)