Talk:Sud-Est SE.200 Amphitrite
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on SNCASE SE.200. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041105180024/http://www.hydroretro.net/etudegh/se200.pdf to http://www.hydroretro.net/etudegh/se200.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Need Help w/ Change
editI was going to make a grammar change to the following sentence: “The remains of the first SE.200 were raised by Dornier in 1966.[6]”
Its the Final sentence before the 1st sub category Operators. However:
1- It’s completely unclear what the sentence is trying to describe… (Remains of what and Revived from where??? i.e. The physical pieces of the parts were retrieved from the bomb site - doubtful).
2- It’s cited with a reference so didnt feel comfortable editing or removing it outright given the sentences lack of clarity.
3 - The reference link works but only provides an archived picture of the plane, no wording @ all to use for clarification OR validation.
4 - I could not find anything after a few brief searches about Dornier, The se.200 or any info from 1966 that correlates the 2.
It appears to be the original wording from the pages creation date. Not sure if this was just looked over or if I’m missing something but any help is greatly appreciated so I know I’m not crazy. Herenow44 (talk) 03:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)