Talk:Successor cardinal

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Arthur Rubin in topic Without choice?

Successor cardinal and Hartogs number edit

Isn't the definition provided at the end of current revision (as a definition without AC)

  .

the same thing as the Hartogs number?

Kompik: Yes, it is. Please sign your contributions to talk with four tildas, e.g. ~~~~. JRSpriggs 03:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Without choice? edit

Do we want to include the following results:

If   is any cardinal, then   (Hartogs number) is a smallest cardinal m such that   (Already included, in part.)

If   Dedekind finite, then   is the successor cardinal of  .

I believe I can show that if   is Dedekind infinite, then   is a successor cardinal of  , but I don't have a reference.

Hence, any cardinal has a successor cardinal. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:32, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply