Talk:Subodh Kerkar
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Subodh Kerkar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright violations (on deleted page)
editThe original CorenSearchBot report was incorrect, as it was actually comparing the article against what appears to be a proxy / cache / copy / clone of EN-WP, or similar, i.e. comparing the article against itself. There are, however, better than 50% copyvios detected by Earwig's detector:
- http://www.subodhkerkar.com/text/Pepper%20Cross%20-%20ecatalogue.pdf
- http://www.youblisher.com/p/926529-Pepper-Cross-E-Catalogue/
For the record, the EN-WP clone was http://www.wikipedia.org.pk/wiki/Subodh_Kerkar (do not trust that site, without proper and full investigation, as it does not look like it is hosted by or connected to the Wikimedia Foundation).
It's unclear to me if those things themselves are "clean", or if they might actually be taking stuff from WP. So, I'm flagging it for the copyvio experts. I may need more coffee, but I just can't fully satisfy myself with exactly who is copying who right now (I also blame the WP clone for disrupting my normal fairly good sense for copyvio).
No copyright violation here
editI own the copyright to this photo, and have no issues with it being worked on and further reused. I release it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). 2405:204:919F:9FBE:F9:AE4E:3A3B:2306 (talk) 21:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
No copyright violation here
editI own the copyright to this photo, and have no issues with it being worked on and further reused. I release it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). fredericknoronha (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC) (Repeating above after logging in.)
- Fredericknoronha, the image is hosted on Wikimedia Commons. There are instructions on your talk-page there on how to provide the necessary permission. There's no connection between the image and the copyright problems in the text of this article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Removed potential copyvios
editHi, I've created a fresh version of the article at this temp page. This version is free of copyvios. Also this particular revision is a clean revision of the page, free of copyvios. Thanks. SerTanmay (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, @Justlettersandnumbers:, kindly do take note of the same. Also, I had tried to ask for your help on the image, which was taken by Fredericknoronha and was provided with the appropriate licensing by him. Do guide us on how to proceed further. SerTanmay (talk) 15:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)