Talk:Subfunctionalization

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there any chance you could add some examples of subfunc? Also, could you talk about its evolutionary importance? EricBakota (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Format of references edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There were two copies of references so I just removed one copy. The section title should be named as References but not Notes since the references are listing in this section. External links were added to the references. Format were changed a bit to reach the requirements. Bingjun Zhang (talk) 23:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

It would be helpful to see a clearer conceptual transition between (or explanation connecting) the second and third sentences.Laraappleby (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

hemoglobin edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hemoglobin's oligomeric architecture is not a case of subfunctionalization. It's alpha and beta chains evolved from a gene duplication event of ancestral, uncooperative dimer. Both chains in isolation retain the ability to form these dimers, but the beta chain in addition can form homotetramers. When both chains are mixed, they form the familiar a2b2 heterotetramer. Hemoglobin's ability to bind oxygen cooperatively emerged only after the duplication and is tied to the emergence of tetramers. It thus represents neofunctionalization. No aspect of the protein subfunctionalized according to current knowledge, because both the alpha and beta chain retain the two pertinent features of their ancestor: oxygen binding and dimerization. See here for details. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2292-y (I am an author on this study)

Other aspects of hemoglobin may be due to subfunctionalization (for example differential expression patterns of its various isoforms).

Georg Hochberg

137.248.1.6 (talk) 07:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic