Talk:Style-shifting
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (September 2010) |
 | The contents of the Style-shifting page were merged into Style (sociolinguistics) on 20 December 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Untitled edit
This article could use some style shifting of its own. It's very dense. aeonite (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Merger proposal edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The proposed target of merger, Register (linguistics) is a redirect to Register (sociolinguistics). Obviously, this page should not be merged to the former.
I oppose merger with the latter. Although style and register are similar topics, there are distinct histories and literatures on each topic in linguistics and sociolinguistics. More importantly, style-shifting is a sub-topic of sociolinguistic discussions of style. Register is not. Cnilep (talk) 17:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Technical edit
This article may be fine for linguistics students but is far too technical for a general encyclopedia. It's almost entirely framed in jargon and specialist terminology and I'm pretty much none the wiser after reading it. Mutt Lunker (talk) 15:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge with Style (sociolinguistics) edit
Merging to Register (sociolinguistics) may have been a bad idea, but I think clearly this ought to be merged with Style (sociolinguistics). The articles are on basically the same topic and cover much of the same ground. AJD (talk) 04:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 
Done