Talk:Sturtevant station

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Arsenikk in topic GA Review
Good articleSturtevant station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 17, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sturtevant (Amtrak station)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Concerning ref 2, would it not be better to update to the 2009 figures. Also, since the passenger figures are references, they don't need to be external links.
    • Updated for 2009, but I did leave the the template in the external links for the ridership figures. This is the case as they are attached to the template for Amtrak stations that are used for all Amtrak station articles.
  • Stating that there is paid parking and that this can be done by day or monthly pass is fine, but the exact dollar values will tend to change, and I tend to figure that this sort of information is best left out.
    • Good call. References to costs have been removed.
  • The hyphens in the refs need to be changed to endashes, 'cus they're punctuation. See WP:DASH. (not stricly a GA criteria, but since there isn't anything else to pick on...)
    • Endashes added.
  • Perhaps mention in the lead that the station is on CPR-owned track.
    • Added.

I am placing the article on hold. Not much to fix up really, and the article will pass. Arsenikk (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply