Wikipedia

Talk:Studio 2054/GA1

< Talk:Studio 2054
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago144 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Been a while since I reviewed one of your articles; I will start on this today! --K. Peake 09:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • The duration is not sourced anywhere in the body
  • Added source in Synopsis section. LOVI33 04:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "support of her second album" → "support of her second studio album,"
  • "The concerts took place" → "The concert took place"
  • It is not sourced anywhere that the postponing was because of COVID-19 in Europe specifically
  • It is presumed that's the case because tour dates were only announced in Europe so far. Although, I will change to simple COVID-19 pandemic as that is sourced. LOVI33 04:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "in order to perform the album live." → "in order to perform songs from the album live."
  • "Studio 2054 was filmed in" → "Studio 2054 was filmed at"
  • "The show was met with highly positive reviews" → "The concert received generally positive reviews" because the fact that it is mentioned how some criticized parts of it makes it clear that the reviews were not highly positive
  •   Not done per WP:SYNTH. I just learned this the other day so essentially, you need a source to say if something was met with negative reviews, positive reviews, etc. I've usually just done based on the reviews for most of my song articles, but I had to change them all today due to this. LOVI33 04:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Are you sure this is the case with reviews though, or that guideline isn't in reference to a different context per this? Also, take a look at the talk page and WP:RECEPTION to grasp a better understanding of what I mean. --K. Peake 07:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Kyle Peake I have reviewed theses articles and specifically the "What synth is not" and WP:RECEPTION make a compelling case. I'm going to change it now, but I will keep the source there and put in a comment for people to refer to here. Thanks for making me aware of this. LOVI33 15:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • LOVI33 Even though the source itself says otherwise from "generally positive", it is not that different plus you have commented here so I don't think it's something that is really offending anyone. Thank you and it is fine that you've got confused; this happens with the various guidelines on Wiki even after having been here for years! --K. Peake 15:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "the many guest performers in the show," → "the many guest performers," to avoid using "the show" too much
  • "for a paid livestream" → "of a paid livestream"

Background and development edit

  • "Production on Studio 2054 began in August 2020 but planning" → "Production of Studio 2054 began in August 2020, but planning"
  • "as she wanted to" → "since she wanted to"
  • "perform live, however her team" → "perform live; however, her team"
  • "like a tv show which changed her mind." → "like a TV show and this changed her mind."
  • "for some human connection" → "for some sort of human connection"
  • "The name comes from" → "The concert's name comes from"
  • "and its mixture of various personalities." → "and its varying personalities." to be less wordy
  • Where is the "four acts" part backed up?
  • Sorry, it for some reason was removed from the USA Today source, but it still appears in is archive. LOVI33 04:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • I don't think "massive" is very encyclopaedic; maybe replace with "large" or something similar?
  • Replaced with "large". LOVI33 04:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • [4][1] should be put in numerical order
  • "custom-built sets where made" → "custom-built sets were made"
  • "They also listed the help" → "Lipa also enlisted the help" since "they" does not refer to any identified group of people
  • "with whom Lipa created a bubble" → "with whom she created a bubble" but this is not backed up anywhere; evoke 1 at this point because that mentions the bubble
  •   Done, but ref 1 is at the end of the sentence. LOVI33 04:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • [6] should be solely at the end of the sentence
  • It's in the middle as it only backs up part of the sentence, the other half is backed up by ref 1. LOVI33 04:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "The rehearsed for the show" → "She rehearsed for the show"
  • Changed to "they" as it is also referring to the dancers. LOVI33 04:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "The concert was part of" → "Studio 2054 was part of"
  • "the show costed $1.5m" → "the show cost $1.5 million" for proper identification
  • "to September 2021, due to the" → "to September 2021 because of the" since there are too many commas in this sentence currently
  • Remove wikilink on COVID-19 pandemic
  • "she also revealed that" → "she also unveiled that"
  • The "exciting" part is not included anywhere in Lipa's tweet
  • Changed to "fun" as that is sourced in the tweet. LOVI33 04:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "coming that following Wednesday." → "coming on 28 October 2020." because there is no point writing the day only once in the article and if not for this, the month will not be mentioned directly anywhere in this sentence
  • "Later that day," → "Later on the day of her initial announcement," to be specific
  • "her website on social media." → "her website on Twitter." with the wikilink
  • "where an announcement" → "when an announcement"
  • Remove wikilink on London
  • Merge the formal announcement and further promotion sentences since they are both too short
  • "Several trailers released up" → "Several trailers were released in the lead up"
  • "guests joined her both" → "guests joined Lipa both"

Synopsis edit

  • Img collection looks really good!
  • I will assume good faith even though I can't properly access The Times ref, but do all of the adverts feature Lipa like the wording makes it seem as if or just the Morrisons one?
  • They all do, reworded to "all featuring Lipa." LOVI33 05:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "and opens in a" → "and opened in a"
  • "features neon lights," → "featured neon lights" with the target
  • "as the enthusiastic dancers cheer" → "as the enthusiastic dancers cheered"
  • "she confidently performs" → "she confidently performed"
  • Why is [40] evoked both mid-sentence and at the end of the sentence? If it is an issue where the ref is used to back up the info before the semi-colon and that at the end of the sentence, then just move all of these to the end since it's only three refs.
  • "Lipa descends the podium and goes" → "Lipa descended the podium and went"
  • The last three paras all mentions acts, so why haven't you mentioning "opening act" in the first one?
  • Added into prose. LOVI33 05:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "and beginning with the "Break My Heart" performance." → "and beginning a performance of "Break My Heart"."
  • "she struts through" → "she strutted through"
  • "then joins the show" → "then joined the show"
  • "Twigs appears on a darkened stage that illuminated by" → "Twigs appeared on a darkened stage that was illuminated by" with the target
  • "Lipa then makes her way" → "Lipa then made her way"
  • "she momentarily picks up a drink" → "she momentarily picked up a drink"
  • "The Blessed Madonna who appears" → "The Blessed Madonna, who appeared"
  • "makes her way to" → "made her way to"
  • "The rendition of "Physical" contained" → "The rendition of the song contained"
  • "dropped to her knees" → "dropped to her knees while"
  • "in her DJ booth." → "in the DJ booth."
  • "make their way to" → "made their way to"
  • "Lipa picks up a phone and slams it" → "Lipa picked up a phone and slammed it"
  • "begins with Lipa walking into a bordello-themed," → "began with Lipa walking into a bordello-themed," with the target
  • "where her brother, Gjin, is" → "where her brother Gjin is"
  • Add release year of Fifa 21 in brackets
  • Comma is not needed after Jeremy Lynch since this is not American English
  • "on the television to a" → "on the TV to a"
  • "with Miley Cyrus." → "with Cyrus."
  • "on the vintage television set" → "on the vintage TV set"
  • "with black jeans and" → "alongside black jeans and"
  • Remove target on Angèle
  • "to perform "Fever" where the two" → "to perform "Fever", during which the two"
  • Remove wikilink on New York City
  • "where Buck Betty performs" → "where Buck Betty performed"
  • "Kylie Minogue is then seen making her way" → "Minogue then made her way"
  • Add release year of Disco in brackets
  • "Elton John opens with a" → "John opened with a"
  • "that is projected on a wall with dancers" → "that was projected on a wall, with dancers"
  • [36][39][38] put in numerical order
  • "She then went through" → "Lipa then went through"
  • "is set off as Lipa screamed" → "was set off as she screamed,"
  • Fullstop is not needed after the exclamation mark, as that is a full quote plus you have punctuation inside the quotes throughout this article

Critical reception edit

  • Img is missing a full-stop at the end; it is required here unlike the other img because a full sentence is included
  • "was met with highly positive reviews from critics." → "was met with generally positive reviews from critics."
  •   Not done per above. LOVI33 05:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove [52] because the reviews themselves back up the reception being generally positive
  •   Not done per above. LOVI33 05:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "In a positive review from" → "In a positive review for"
  • "he commended it for" → "he commended the show for"
  • "agreed with Cairns in terms of Minogue and John's performance" this is not accurate wording, since Cairns didn't even mention their performances
  • Was meant to be McCormick, my mistake. LOVI33 05:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Giving the show four stars," → "Giving the show four stars out of five," to specify the rating because otherwise people may think it is a four out of four rating like some publications use as a system. However, you do not have to specify for the star ratings after this since "out of five" being noted most recently makes it clear they follow the same ratings system.
  • "viewed that the show was" → "viewed the show as"
  • "he thought that the show" → "he thought that it"
  • "to great" as well as" → "to great," as well as"
  • "additionally called it" → "additionally called the show"
  • "of the present" and" → "of the present," and"
  • "the guest star's performances" → "the guest stars' performances"
  • "Lipa's performance, vocals, and" → "Lipa's performance and vocals, and"
  • "and praised Lipa performance and her" → "and directing praise towards Lipa performance alongside her"
  • "In a mixed review from" → "In a mixed review for"
  • "the setlist, and" → "the setlist and"

Commercial reception and future edit

  • Retitle to Commercial reception and impact
  • "Tickets went on sale for better prices for people on" → "They went on sale at better prices for people who"
  • "on 3 November and 16 November 2020." → "on 3 and 16 November 2020, respectively."
  • "This number included" → "The number included"
  • "estimates that the actual viewership of closer" → "estimated that the actual viewership was closer"
  • "eight or nine million as they presume" → "8 or 9 million, as they presumed"
  • "ticket sales for Lipa's Future Nostalgia tour" → "ticket sales for the Future Nostalgia Tour"

Set list edit

  • Add the appropriate source(s) here

Streams edit

  • Good

Personnel edit

  • Shouldn't you add that Lipa served as lead performer or whatever the closing credits identify her role as? Keep her in the current position either way.
  • They just credited her as herself but I will add that. LOVI33 05:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

References edit

Notes edit

  • This should be a section directly above references
  • estimates the number is → estimated the number was

Citations edit

  • This should no longer be a sub-section because it will make up the entirety of the references section
  • Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
  • Remove the author from ref 6
  • Fix MOS:CAPS issues with refs 19, 22, 25, 26, 33, 56 and 58
  • Dummy Magazine → Dummy Mag on ref 48

External links edit

  • Good

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold after I noticed during the review that OR was a noticeable issue in parts, hoping you can resolve the problems arisen though! --K. Peake 17:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Hey Kyle Peake, thanks for another review! I have addressed all you comments, hopefully I cleared some things up. Let me know if I need to do anything else. LOVI33 05:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • LOVI33 Amazing response like your usual ones, but I only have one query and that is about the synth guideline; interesting catch there, however. --K. Peake 07:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • LOVI33 ✓ Pass after you resolved that one problem! --K. Peake 15:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Studio_2054/GA1&oldid=998051800"