Talk:Student development theories

{{WikiProject banner shell|1=

Untitled edit

Simplified History of Replacement

The article currently says that "In the middle of the twentieth century the student service paradigm was replaced by the student development paradigm." The article talks as though each method was replaced outright by the next one during a certain time period. I would have thought that there would be some old-fashioned schools that continued to teach in the old methods even as new ones became more popular. So to say that "Teaching strategy Y replaced teaching strategy X during the early 1900's" sounds like a huge oversimplification of the history. Granted, I am personally more interested in the viewpoints and strategies themselves than the histories, but this still seems to be an inaccurate way to describe history. --Todemo

You are likely right, please feel free to be bold and correct and improve the article.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm afraid this page reads like a poorly-written freshman psychology paper, riddled with simplistic stereotypes. It should be marked as poor quality. --A passing reader who was looking for useful information —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.173.169 (talk) 07:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Justin Javier (talk) 04:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Hello Wikipedia Community, My name is Justin, and plan on adding Sanford's Theory of Challenge and Support to this wikipedia page in the coming week as part of my graduate school methods course that has encouraged my cohort to contribute to the wikipedia community. I plan on using the following sources to support the theory and prove its positive correlation as related to student development. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]Reply

References

  1. ^ Patton. L. D., Renn. K. A., Guido. F. M., and Quaye S. J. (2016). Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice Third Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. pp. 12–36. ISBN 9781118821817.
  2. ^ Strange, C (1994). "Student development: The evolution and status of an essential idea". Journal of College Student Development. 35: 399–412.
  3. ^ Chaves, C. (2006). Involvement, development, and retention: Theoretical foundations and potential extensions for adult community college students. Community College Review, 34(2), 139-152. 
  4. ^ Zhao, C. and Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research In Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138.
  5. ^ Berg, M. V. (2009). Intervening in student learning abroad: a research-based inquiry. Intercultural Education, 20, S15-27.
  6. ^ Alvarez, A. N. (2002). Racial identity and Asian Americans: supports and challenges. New Directions For Student Services, (97), 33-43.
  7. ^ Marx, E. (2012). Advising to promote self-authorship: exploring advising strategies and advisor characteristics among new student affairs professionals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of San Diego, California.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2020 and 9 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bazookabird.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 2 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WolfeU.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply