Talk:Stuart Schuffman

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Adleid in topic Sourcing

Notability edit

With the exception of this SF article -- http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/15/NSK4T84GO.DTL&type=books -- there seems to be little news coverage of this subject that meets WP:RS and nothing that justifies (or sources) the level of detail in the article. The article should be seriously pruned or deleted unless there are other reliable sources that can show notability. Flowanda | Talk 09:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Quite. Tagging for you. It's pretty much all written by User:Setosis who's contributed only to this page. Sigh. AdventurousMe (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing edit

The majority of this article is either sourced to primary sources (the subject's own website) or unsourced. I cleaned up some blatantly promotional parts, but I think this article could use a rewrite or deletion if the notability isn't there. Adleid (talk) 23:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply