Talk:Stripped (Christina Aguilera album)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 20:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

This is one of my all-time favorite albums and most played on my iPod. I'll do this review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 20:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Ha, me too! It's one my favorite albums — HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I just noticed that you tagged this with {{under construction}} @ 10:52, 18 August 2013. Very odd for a GAN to have such a tag. Stability is one of the WP:WIAGA criteria. I will get back to this and reassess what kind of changes you are making.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

• Please resolve the disambiguation link issue from the tool box on the right.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 06:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
• Please resolve the two external link issues in the tool box on the right.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
  • The EL tool seems to be down right now.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

I am not a reg at WP:ALBUMs, but should the things at List of awards and nominations received by Christina Aguilera from this album be in a table in this article?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

It's not necessary, but if you want, I'll add the table of awards and nominations — HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I think they should be included unless there is some policy against it.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:48, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:LEAD

• discuss about--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done

• the top five charts of ->the top five of charts in--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done

• became Aguilera's top-ten hit in several regions - is a word missing first or something. Otherwise change Aguilera to a.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

I've fixed it to "became Aguilera's third top-ten hit worldwide from Stripped". What do you think? — HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Background

• "the genre's upward financial trend" s/b something like "the genre's financial lure"--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done

• "Following the event" - What event do you mean "Following the managerial shakeup"?-TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done — HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Recording

• Did Aguilera really date that Jorge Santos?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, according to several books and sources

But it seems he died 40 years before she was born.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

I've fixed it. Actually that Jorge Santos was one of her dancers, not Santos Jorge that you mentioned — HĐ (talk) 04:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

• When you use a linked full name. Subsequent uses do not need the full name (e.g., Linda Perry and Scott Storch).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done

N--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I've done it. Please check again. — Simon (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

See WP:LASTNAME.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

How about now? — Simon (talk) 03:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

N The first name I checked appears in the prose four times in full (three of them linked).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Is it okay now? — Simon (talk) 04:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Songs

• Does "out-Whitney" mean that she sang in Whitney's style in a manner that rivaled Whitney?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

It's a quote. — HĐ (talk) 01:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

You must contextualize the quote.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Because "out-Whitney" is very misleading, so I've removed it. — Simon (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Singles and other charted songs

• What is meant by the phrase "life circle of moths."?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done

• How unusual is it not to talk about songs being certified? I think something like "managed chart success in several countries" should be followed by "and was certified gold in the United States and Australia".

 Done

• Do we know why DIrrty was certified in so many more countries than Beautiful, even though the latter was number one in so many more countries.--04:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Music certifications are based on sales, not chart positions. — HĐ (talk) 04:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Live performances

• Don't assume the reader knows what chaps are.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Touring

• US$ goes before the number.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done

• If 30 Mil was 16th, what was 75 mil?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done, per the source from PopEater is not so reliable — HĐ (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Reviews

• The Allmusic review is so close to a direct quote that you should either quote it exactly or paraphrase.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done

• For a 55 metacritic rating, I thought nearly half of the comments might be positive. That is not the case. Am I mistaken?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

In the source it says "Mixed or average" — HĐ (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

• Some citations are missing parameters.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done

Images

• File:Alicia Keys 2011.jpg, File:Dirrty.jpg and File:Stripped Tour CH - cropped.jpg all need {{personality rights}}.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't think so because they're famous people, and their images are on the web everyday. — HĐ (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Because they are famous is precisely why the tag is needed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I think it's unnecessary, per images for other music FAs such as "Cry Me a River (Justin Timberlake song)" or recently, "Love the Way You Lie"? — Simon (talk) 10:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Don't rely on logic similar to WP:OTHERSTUFF. Examine these files and consider whether the tags are useful. I feel they are. You are free to find an image reviewer who says otherwise.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Alright,  Done — Simon (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:CAPTIONs

• The main image needs a caption.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Per {{Infobox album}} it isn't necessary

• The final image has a caption that ends in a period indicating that it is a full sentence when this is not the case.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

It's a full sentence then. What do you mean? — HĐ (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Performed would be a proper verb for the CAPTION. However, performing is not a verb.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done — Simon (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

• This article is now on hold. I will monitor its progress and reevaluate in 7 days. I should note that the recent progress has been slow. I apologize if that is in any way due to my slow review.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
• I have just PASSed this article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

• Oh WoW! Thanks a bunch! — Simon (talk) 09:56, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.